post icon

Recruiting and Researching in Turkey

In his March 2006 article, “Rec­ru­iting in Europe”, Dr. John Sul­li­van under­li­ned that talent has become a glo­bal com­mo­dity and that rec­ru­iters’ tool­kit sho­uld con­tain an arse­nal of tools that work out­side their back­yard as well. Sul­li­van also cal­led for atten­tion to Turkey that pro­duce highly edu­ca­ted popu­la­ti­ons and yield the ever-so-popular wage differential.

Turkey is a pro­mi­nent country not only for glo­bal rec­ru­iters but also for rec­ru­iting rese­arc­hers. For example, many rec­ru­iting app­li­ca­tion that takes place in ere.net, just start to be prac­ti­ced later than U.S. but subs­tan­ti­ally adop­ted and ope­ra­ti­ona­li­zed at a con­si­de­rable high pace. Sub­se­qu­ently, this fact enab­les us to inves­ti­gate the fin­dings yiel­ded from U.S. wit­hin a country that has col­lec­ti­vist cul­ture like Turkey. Con­se­qu­ently, it is pos­sible to assert that an app­li­ca­tion that pro­vi­des posi­tive out­come in Turkey can be asses­sed to be uni­ver­sal and can be app­lied to out­side of U.S.. Espe­ci­ally, chal­len­ges per­ta­ining to human reso­urce that multi-national firms face in Turkey may shed insight into human reso­urce ope­ra­ti­ons in simi­lar settings.  
 
Now, it is quite pos­sible to assert that some rese­arc­hes which have been con­duc­ted in last four years subs­tan­ti­ate Sullivan’s fore­sight. For example; “The Most Admi­red Firms in Turkey Pro­ject” (pub­lis­hed in Busi­nes­s­week Turkey, 2nd–8th May 2010) which had gat­he­red data from app­ro­xi­ma­tely 15.000 uni­ver­sity stu­dents in last two years has pro­vi­ded con­si­de­rable results which indi­cate that the most inf­lu­en­tial com­mu­ni­ca­tion chan­nel in turns of affec­ting stu­dents’ cho­ice of firm was found to be social net­works. The second inf­lu­en­tial com­mu­ni­ca­tion chan­nel that affects stu­dents’ cho­ice of firm was found to be news about the firm on media. Emp­lo­yees of the pros­pec­tive emp­lo­yer were the third inf­lu­en­tial infor­ma­tion source. These facts veri­fies Sullivan’s hypot­he­sis which is sug­ges­ting that Turks take integ­rity seri­o­usly and have a work ethic that far out­pa­ces many Euro­pean nati­ons, cre­ating a situ­ation that is per­fect for refer­ral prog­rams. On the other hand, job boards were shown to be taking only the eighth place in terms of affec­ting stu­dents’ cho­ices. Asses­sing all these fin­dings toget­her it is pos­sible to state that stu­dents tend to obtain infor­ma­tion pri­ma­rily by the means of word of mouth and pub­li­city that are asc­ri­bed as trus­t­worthy. Cont­ra­rily, they uti­lize the job boards or adver­ti­se­ments for chec­king their works’ pre­sence. In other words, they uti­lize them to obtain infor­ma­tion about the reli­abi­lity of per­ta­ining firms’ vacant positions.  
 
Besi­des, fin­dings that was yiel­ded from the ques­ti­ons that aimed to cap­ture stu­dents’ iden­tity pro­fi­les demonst­ra­tes Turkish people’s eager­ness about lear­ning in vein with Sullivan’s interp­re­ta­ti­ons. Espe­ci­ally, fin­dings show that while stu­dents mostly asc­ribe impor­tance to self-development oppor­tu­ni­ties; wage and work-life balance issues is seen to be the least impor­tant fac­tors by students. 
 
Related Posts with Thumbnails

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree Plugin